لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners may possibly seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
maintaining the conviction awarded to your appellant reduce the sentence in the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been from the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally audio, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of your petitioners for promotion could be regarded, however, we have been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, topic to availability of vacancy subject matter towards the approval of your competent authority.
Reasonable grounds can be obtained around the record to connect the petitioner with the commission in the alleged offence. Though punishment from the alleged offence does not drop within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. still acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is in the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case on the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, assistance has actually been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be one particular or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for your decision of the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Accessing free case legislation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and anybody seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
This website public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station resulting from opportunity health risks and hazards.
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only done if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Unless of course case is tried(Bail Matters)
ninety . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is additionally important to note that neither seniority nor promotion would be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion can be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for getting to be entitled to generally be viewed as for promotion to some higher grade, of course, is just not without logic as being the officer who's originally inducted to a particular post needs to serve within the mentioned post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and also to provide the public in a very befitting fashion.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and opportunity hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, when observing the general craze supports that electromagnetic fields have damaging effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle established out inside the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Improvement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.